If anyone believes me to be a conspiracy theorist or crazy on my belief that the NH primary (and possibly all others) was unsecured and likely compromised, please watch this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKQEQ7qHvgM
Video was recorded by blackboxvoting.org, an elections watchdog group.
There are no words to express how sickening is the proof of insecurity demonstrated in this video.
Pay close attention to NH Secretary of State Bill Gardner.
Never was a look of impropriety more obvious.
Friday, January 25, 2008
Thursday, January 24, 2008
Bin Laden Found
It turns out that the Saudi, who is blamed for the 9/11 attacks on the U.S. World Trade Center has been hiding on the planet Mars since around 2004, when the image was first captured by the Spirit Rover.
“This is groundbreaking news,” said as unnamed NASA official. “I mean, who would have thought that he would have been right under our nose this entire time? We were so busy looking for the legendary Face on Mars that we completely overlooked an actual man on Mars.”
President Bush has already asked for an increase in the Defense budget so that the US can pursue the fugitive and finally capture the man who has been a thorn in the Bush Administration’s side since 2001.
“These men are cowards who hide on our moons and our planets, and they will be brought to justice.” Bush said in a statement issued from the White House on Thursday.
“I mean, what happens if they get a hold of our Sun? Imagine if they had a huge ball of fire at their disposal.”
Mr. Bush has asked for the additional 5 billion dollars in order to build a fleet of tankers to “Bring back that terrorist and his filthy terrorist oil” from Mars. He then added, “There’s oil on Mars, right?”
-AB
Monday, January 21, 2008
Go Fishing.
Everyone has heard the old proverb that says, "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime."
The problem with America today is that not only have we neglected to learn how to fish, but we rely on the government to cut it up and feed us as well.
The problem with America today is that not only have we neglected to learn how to fish, but we rely on the government to cut it up and feed us as well.
Will you remain silent?
"Our lives begin to end the day we
become silent about things that matter."
~ Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
How can we be silent in an age when our Founding Fathers are considered terrorists?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPg9MdN9Gio
How can we keep our mouths shut and sit idly by while the talking heads of media call for military suppression of peaceful protests against the current Establishment, a complete violation of 1st Amendment rights?
Must we watch silently as our civil liberties are trampled in the name of an illusion of peace?
Must we remain mute when our own economy sits on the brink of collapse and yet our government continues excessive spending to police foreign countries and 'nation build' in places that only stand to benefit the personal coffers of those in a position of authority?
When dissension becomes a crime, and when belief in personal freedom while upholding a moral standard throws up red flags, when the a belief in basic human rights becomes something that labels a person as a danger to society, we have reached a crossroads where a decision needs to be made.
Do we remain silent as the darkness closes in around us, and death overtakes us?
Or do we hold the light of truth high, and reveal what was previously hidden to everyone who has the ears to hear?
Indeed, our lives will have ended on the day we choose to remain silent.
become silent about things that matter."
~ Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
How can we be silent in an age when our Founding Fathers are considered terrorists?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPg9MdN9Gio
How can we keep our mouths shut and sit idly by while the talking heads of media call for military suppression of peaceful protests against the current Establishment, a complete violation of 1st Amendment rights?
Must we watch silently as our civil liberties are trampled in the name of an illusion of peace?
Must we remain mute when our own economy sits on the brink of collapse and yet our government continues excessive spending to police foreign countries and 'nation build' in places that only stand to benefit the personal coffers of those in a position of authority?
When dissension becomes a crime, and when belief in personal freedom while upholding a moral standard throws up red flags, when the a belief in basic human rights becomes something that labels a person as a danger to society, we have reached a crossroads where a decision needs to be made.
Do we remain silent as the darkness closes in around us, and death overtakes us?
Or do we hold the light of truth high, and reveal what was previously hidden to everyone who has the ears to hear?
Indeed, our lives will have ended on the day we choose to remain silent.
Monday, January 14, 2008
Monday Discussion Day
Week 1:
What is the most important issue to you during this election, and why?
Post your thoughts in the comments log.
What is the most important issue to you during this election, and why?
Post your thoughts in the comments log.
Friday, January 11, 2008
The Right Requires Responsibility
With Super Tuesday approaching, and the General Election after that, it is vital that everyone who is able and willing should vote for the candidate who they feel will get this country to the place it needs to be.
This is a hard-earned right, fought and died for by our Patriotic predecessors and established by our Founding Fathers. However, with this right, as with all rights, comes the responsibility to do the right thing.
I would encourage everyone to get out there and learn about the candidates. Do your research. There are plenty of online sources, from the media outlets to meetup groups, Wikipedia to official campaign pages. Learn where each candidate stands on the issues. Evaluate whether their beliefs and goals are aligned with your own. Don't merely cast your vote for the frontrunner or the person voted "most likely to..." unless you can stand behind that person and be united with one voice.
If you aren't sure what the candidates stand for, and don't have any official preference other than "I like his hair" or "He is energetic," or "I've heard his name a lot," I would encourage you to do the world a favor and stay home on polling day.
Casting a vote blindly just because you can, or because everyone else is doing it is dangerous, and wrong.
Imagine if you were walking down the street, and you saw a group of people pulling on a rope. These people were grunting, and struggling, and pulling with all of their might. Now imagine you asked these people, "Why are you doing that?" to which they answered, "Because we can, and you can too!"
Would you join in and pull the rope, unaware of what was on the end or what the ultimate goal was?
Suppose with your help, the group was able to pull the rope all the way in...at which point you found that you had just assisted them in hauling an enormous ticking time bomb into the center of town. Would you feel that you had accomplished something good? Or would you have now endangered everyone around you because you blindly exercised a right without practicing responsibility?
I encourage you to think about this for the rest of the day, and ask yourself, "Am I pulling blindly?" or do you know what is on the end of that rope?
Maybe it's something that will save the day. Maybe something that will destroy us all.
It's up to you to figure it out.
This is a hard-earned right, fought and died for by our Patriotic predecessors and established by our Founding Fathers. However, with this right, as with all rights, comes the responsibility to do the right thing.
I would encourage everyone to get out there and learn about the candidates. Do your research. There are plenty of online sources, from the media outlets to meetup groups, Wikipedia to official campaign pages. Learn where each candidate stands on the issues. Evaluate whether their beliefs and goals are aligned with your own. Don't merely cast your vote for the frontrunner or the person voted "most likely to..." unless you can stand behind that person and be united with one voice.
If you aren't sure what the candidates stand for, and don't have any official preference other than "I like his hair" or "He is energetic," or "I've heard his name a lot," I would encourage you to do the world a favor and stay home on polling day.
Casting a vote blindly just because you can, or because everyone else is doing it is dangerous, and wrong.
Imagine if you were walking down the street, and you saw a group of people pulling on a rope. These people were grunting, and struggling, and pulling with all of their might. Now imagine you asked these people, "Why are you doing that?" to which they answered, "Because we can, and you can too!"
Would you join in and pull the rope, unaware of what was on the end or what the ultimate goal was?
Suppose with your help, the group was able to pull the rope all the way in...at which point you found that you had just assisted them in hauling an enormous ticking time bomb into the center of town. Would you feel that you had accomplished something good? Or would you have now endangered everyone around you because you blindly exercised a right without practicing responsibility?
I encourage you to think about this for the rest of the day, and ask yourself, "Am I pulling blindly?" or do you know what is on the end of that rope?
Maybe it's something that will save the day. Maybe something that will destroy us all.
It's up to you to figure it out.
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Vote Manipulation
I’ve actually seen some posts on blackboxvoting.org and other message boards where people who attended caucuses in Iowa reported a lot of irregularities and secrecy with the counting and reporting. One person even provided totals for several precincts she monitored, with Ron Paul winning a couple and placing no lower than third in the others. Multiple other people had commented that Ron won in their precincts.
Michael Rivero of WhatReallyHappened.com wrote on his site:
"I received numerous emails from Iowans who had participated in the Caucus, and they were reporting Ron Paul wins in the rooms they voted in."
New Hampshire has now been thrown under the magnifier by the concerned citizens, however this story is being mostly ignored by mainstream media outlets such as CNN (Communist News Network) and Fox (Faux) News.
In some of my online research, I found a quote by Michael Collins of OpEdNews.com who has this to say:
"81% of New Hampshire ballots are counted in secret by a private corporation named Diebold Election Systems (now known as “Premier”). The elections run on these machines are programmed by one company, LHS Associates, based in Methuen, MA. We know nothing about the people programming these machines, and we know even less about LHS Associates. We know even less about the secret vote counting software used to tabulate 81% of our ballots. People like to say “but we use paper ballots! They can always be counted by hand!”
But they’re not. They’re counted by Diebold. Only a candidate can request a hand recount, and most never do so. And a rigged election can easily become a rigged recount, as we learned in Ohio 2004, where two election officials were convicted of rigging their recount…"
This immediately brought to mind a video segment I had seen with Lou Dobbs where they showed how easily the Diebold machines are hacked and manipulated.
Video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=261IlYmisyE
Ben Moseley of benmoseley.blogspot.com wrote in a post:
"I don't intend to sound off alarm bells, but the question does need to be asked, as we have seen signs of this in the past, such as in Ohio during the 2004 general election. I just spent the last two hours putting together a spreadsheet of the Democratic results of the NH primary for each town with almost all but a few towns reporting, and the results were somewhat surprising. (Note: This is also without including nearly 2500 write-ins due to time constraints.)
I say "somewhat" because some people will say this entirely foreseeable. What the informal statistics show is that Hillary Clinton received a 4.5% boost in towns using Diebold voting machines compared to towns that didn't. Meanwhile, Obama was hurt in these towns showing a 2.5% decrease in the Diebold towns.
...Some more statistics from the data shows that Obama in non-Diebold towns garnering 38.7% of the vote to Clinton's 36.2%. The results in Diebold towns show the exact opposite: Clinton with 40.7% of the vote and Obama with 36.2%. Not only are the positions swapped but the informal statistics have the second place candidate holding 36.2% in both cases, which could easily be a pure coincidence. What doesn't make a lot of sense to me right now and this could be a mathematical mistake on my part is where Clinton got the extra 2% of votes in Diebold towns. All the other numbers almost exact for every candidate, even Edwards who received 17% of the vote in Diebold towns compared to 17.6% in non-Diebold towns..."
The video here: http://www.fliggo.com/video/sk0SiTCu shows a former computer programmer who was asked by the Speaker of The House of Florida to write a simple program for rigging the vote testifying before a court.
Now we have admissions of fraudulent results in New Hampshire, as you’ll read in the linked article. The article reveals a blatant example of erroneous results that people have been speculating about since the beginning.
Considering the admission of irregularity in this story was outright exclusion of Dr. Paul, we also have to now wonder what sort of vote moving and miscounting was also possibly taking place with the machine voting for all the candidates.
Enjoy the read, and remember what Stalin said…
"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything."
Michael Rivero of WhatReallyHappened.com wrote on his site:
"I received numerous emails from Iowans who had participated in the Caucus, and they were reporting Ron Paul wins in the rooms they voted in."
New Hampshire has now been thrown under the magnifier by the concerned citizens, however this story is being mostly ignored by mainstream media outlets such as CNN (Communist News Network) and Fox (Faux) News.
In some of my online research, I found a quote by Michael Collins of OpEdNews.com who has this to say:
"81% of New Hampshire ballots are counted in secret by a private corporation named Diebold Election Systems (now known as “Premier”). The elections run on these machines are programmed by one company, LHS Associates, based in Methuen, MA. We know nothing about the people programming these machines, and we know even less about LHS Associates. We know even less about the secret vote counting software used to tabulate 81% of our ballots. People like to say “but we use paper ballots! They can always be counted by hand!”
But they’re not. They’re counted by Diebold. Only a candidate can request a hand recount, and most never do so. And a rigged election can easily become a rigged recount, as we learned in Ohio 2004, where two election officials were convicted of rigging their recount…"
This immediately brought to mind a video segment I had seen with Lou Dobbs where they showed how easily the Diebold machines are hacked and manipulated.
Video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=261IlYmisyE
Ben Moseley of benmoseley.blogspot.com wrote in a post:
"I don't intend to sound off alarm bells, but the question does need to be asked, as we have seen signs of this in the past, such as in Ohio during the 2004 general election. I just spent the last two hours putting together a spreadsheet of the Democratic results of the NH primary for each town with almost all but a few towns reporting, and the results were somewhat surprising. (Note: This is also without including nearly 2500 write-ins due to time constraints.)
I say "somewhat" because some people will say this entirely foreseeable. What the informal statistics show is that Hillary Clinton received a 4.5% boost in towns using Diebold voting machines compared to towns that didn't. Meanwhile, Obama was hurt in these towns showing a 2.5% decrease in the Diebold towns.
...Some more statistics from the data shows that Obama in non-Diebold towns garnering 38.7% of the vote to Clinton's 36.2%. The results in Diebold towns show the exact opposite: Clinton with 40.7% of the vote and Obama with 36.2%. Not only are the positions swapped but the informal statistics have the second place candidate holding 36.2% in both cases, which could easily be a pure coincidence. What doesn't make a lot of sense to me right now and this could be a mathematical mistake on my part is where Clinton got the extra 2% of votes in Diebold towns. All the other numbers almost exact for every candidate, even Edwards who received 17% of the vote in Diebold towns compared to 17.6% in non-Diebold towns..."
The video here: http://www.fliggo.com/video/sk0SiTCu shows a former computer programmer who was asked by the Speaker of The House of Florida to write a simple program for rigging the vote testifying before a court.
Now we have admissions of fraudulent results in New Hampshire, as you’ll read in the linked article. The article reveals a blatant example of erroneous results that people have been speculating about since the beginning.
Considering the admission of irregularity in this story was outright exclusion of Dr. Paul, we also have to now wonder what sort of vote moving and miscounting was also possibly taking place with the machine voting for all the candidates.
Enjoy the read, and remember what Stalin said…
"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
